rate this
Why Husbands Get Dumped



© 2008 Beth Witrogen All Rights Reserved

Why do husbands get dumped? This single article generated more response than just about anything I've ever written. I heard from men and women around the country. Some were angry, some were sad, but most of them said, "Oh my God! This is exactly what's happening in my marriage."

Here's the back story: After watching several friends leave their husbands after years of trying to get the man engaged, I realized that most of these guys didn't have a clue. They got dumped without ever knowing why. It was obvious to me (and their former wives) that the men had been emotionally — and in many cases — physically absent during their marriages. In talking with the now ex-husbands, I could see that the poor men still didn't know what they had done wrong.

So I wrote a column that would help men understand — at least a little bit — how a marriage enters the danger zone, and what they can do to avoid getting dumped.

The response was overwhelming; here's a small sample:

From a woman who left her marriage:
You hit the nail right on the head! Unfortunately, it came too late for my marriage. Maybe if I had it to leave on the back of the toilet a few years ago, things may have been different. I may mail it to my ex anyway, highlight my favorite parts and add, do you get it NOW!?!?

From a husband who got dumped:
I must say your article was a perfect description of the events leading up to my very painful divorce about five years ago. I continue to be haunted by the memories of a marriage that I probably could have saved, had I known then what I know now.

From a husband hoping to salvage his marriage:
Can you provide me the name of the counselor that you utilized? I am pulling out all the stops and would like to suggest this. There simply is too much at stake to not try it.

How about you? Does this scenario match what's going on in your own marriage? Let me know your thoughts:

“We need to talk.”

The words strike fear into the hearts of men. Yet those who ignore it, do so at their own peril.

With the epidemiclike trend of more and more women filing for divorce, I’ve noticed an increasingly common phenomenon: husbands caught completely off guard when their wife announces that she wants out.

If you’re a man with a seemingly stable marriage, you might not think this applies to you. But think again.

I personally know of at least five husbands whose lives were blown apart when the woman they assumed was happy, or at least happy enough, informed them that she had in fact been miserable for years, and that she couldn’t stand to live another minute in the same house.

(Hint: If your wife left this article perched on the back of the toilet, you might want to read further.)



©2008 Beth Witrogen All Rights Reserved

The scenario goes like this:

A couple gets married, gets jobs, pays bills, has kids and somewhere along the line, the inevitable conflicts ensue.

His parents did it this way, hers did it that way, he wants to watch TV, she wants to host a book club, they disagree about money or sofa fabric, in short: They’re married.

The woman thinks that the best way to solve the problems is to get the husband more emotionally engaged. She wants to talk about it (read: fight) or go see a counselor, or she may just endlessly badger him to get home for dinner on time.

Sometimes she’s skillful, sometimes she’s a screaming shrew, but in her mind, she’s trying to “improve” the marriage.

However, very few men gleefully jump into highly charged emotional dramas.

More likely, the husband resists, dreading the potential conflict and often fearing that counseling will be a dissection of all his flaws. Plus, who’s got time to talk when you’re trying to hold down a job, a task many men view as their primary contribution to marriage.

So he tries to ignore it, burying himself television, golf, or the office, hoping the problem will go away.

And it does. After months, or sometimes years, of trying to get her man engaged, the woman gives up and makes do with the status quo.

Thus, the marriage enters the danger zone.

While the husband is relieved that they’re no longer fighting, the wife is so angry and heartbroken that she can’t even bear to make eye contact with him.

She spends more time with her friends or church. She may get a job or start volunteering, and slowly but surely, she creates an emotional support system that doesn’t include her husband.

So while he’s thinking things are better because she’s quit nagging, she’s growing farther away every single day. And she’s even more hurt because he doesn’t even seem to notice.

Then one day she realizes: I’m happier without him than I am with him. And that’s when she drops the bomb.

The saddest part is that many men don’t even know why they got dumped. I had one friend whose husband came back to her the next day with a diamond ring, promising that he would go to counseling, quit working late and do all the other things she had begged him for a few years back.

But unfortunately, it was too late. She’d been leaving him for years, and by the time she told him, she was already gone.

Why do I understand the wifely withdrawal scenario so well? I was unknowingly partway down the path myself a few years back, silently brewing and stewing, until fate — and a highly skilled counselor — intervened. I was lucky because my husband somewhat willingly put aside his discomfort to step into the terrifying world of feelings and emotions.

So wake up guys: Wedded bliss takes work. If your wife wants to talk, it’s probably time to put down the remote and engage.

Lisa Earle McLeod is a top-selling author, nationally syndicated newspaper columnist, frequent media guest, inspirational humorist and sought-after keynote speaker. Her first book,”Forget Perfect,” has been called "hilarious help for everyone who has put themselves last on their own priority list." Her most recent book, “Finding Grace When You Can’t Even Find Clean Underwear,” covers everything from TV and religion to sex and fast food. More information about Ms. McLeod is available at forgetperfect.com. Send your questions to Lisa@smartnow.com.


Discussions
david responded on August 3, 2008
"I could see that the poor men still didn't know what they had done wrong." Hang on. Maybe this is a humorous approach that's gone over my head, but it seems that you want readers to take you seriously when you describe guys who took a long time to agree to marriage, marriages which subsequently fell apart, mainly because the men were emotionally unavailable. If there's something entertainingly funny in there, I've missed it. On a serious note, then, how is it that the men did something wrong? They didn't particularly want marriage, they weren't particularly keen on making it work, and (no surprise) the marriages didn't work. The obvious interpretation is that things went wrong when they agreed to marry. These men were not prepared for marriage, and it was a mistake to push them into it. If you are serious, your analysis should proceed from that point - perhaps noting that marriage isn't necessarily good for a relationship - rather than blaming the men for a problem that is equally the women's. Humour aside, the story is written in a way that betrays a bias against men, yet could equally have been biased against women, blaming them for not understanding, not judging correctly, et cetera. The point then is to explain it without blame, without making one or the other party responsible for the lack of clear judgment, for all the failings over the course of time. As it is, this story may provide insights to some, but to others, it's just another bit of nagging. Unfortunately, the latter group is the one you need to engage. If they are the type described above, they may require a lot of coaching before they admit to being unhappy, and my focus would be on developing a safe space to explore those feelings.
Matt responded on August 4, 2008
Wow, what a revealing article. Not about the subject, as much better has been written elsewhere by actual professionals, but from the stunningly myopic view, almost bordering on misandry. Rather than give women effective ways on communicating with their loved ones, the article appears to reinforce the negative message that it's OK to suffer in silence and/or dump the husband, because he doesn't 'get' it. Mmmm, some work needed, me thinks. Any counsellor will tell you that the key to any relationship is communication. However, it needs to be effective communication. Nagging is a very poor form of communicating. It is akin to a child continually tugging on your coat, asking for an ice cream every few minutes. As you can appreciate, it doesn't take long to tune out or completely ignore it. Why not suggest to the struggling wives and girlfriends out there, that they try different ways of communicating with their hearts delight. For example, they could have a phrase that both of them recognise as a 'issue flag', something along the lines of "Honey, can I discuss something important with you ?" The trick being, is not to overuse it, or use it for trivial matters. Naturally, this applies to the husbands as well. "...very few men gleefully jump into highly charged dramas." Uh huh, can't imagine too many women would be thrilled at this prospect either. So why not suggest taking the emotional payload out ? Men tend not to react well to emotionally amped situations, it puts us in either an offensive or defensive mindset, neither being ideal for a tender loving chat. Instead, use our predictable nature to your advantage. Men love to fix things and find solutions, more so if it's for our wife, the living blossom we've stood by for years. Put it to your man as a problem, (and this is the important part) work with him on the solution. Be prepared to come to an acceptable compromise. However, nowhere in the article is any of this basic advice suggested. Nor have you entertained the aspects of timing, opportunity and cooperation in these discussions. Instead you've summarised for the female readers that if your husband isn't listening to your every word, then he's not pulling his weight in the marriage. I'm sorry, but that's just simply wrong. May I suggest in future, you actually consult some professionals before you type out any more of this tripe, because as it currently written is both damaging, incorrect and insulting.
wade responded on August 5, 2008
i'm not sure I agree
julie responded on August 5, 2008
on Behalf of T, second try: 'I know this is supposed to a humours entry, but it comes off as a bit misandric. The scenario you outline isn't exclusive to me becoming increasingly distant. These shoes fit woemn as well. My marriage fits your "danger zone" description, only the roles are reversed. My wife of 11 years seems to have become totally disinterested in our life together. She'd rather sit in front of the television than go out; she shuts down everey time I try to engage her in discussions of our emotional status quo; she isnt interested in counseling, for fear that it will be simply a dissection of her flaws - sound familiar? So in the meantime, I seek out friends and social interactions that don't involve her and find myself more comfortable, and yes, happier. Unfortunately, there are so many male-specific stigmas associated with that and I get painted as the absent husband. If I decide that our marriage is no longer there to save, then I'm seen as going through a mid-life crisis. My wife's support syste, will rally to her with love and sympathy, while I will be just another !!@! who screwed up his marriage. Wake up ladies: Wedded bliss takes work. And it's unfair to lay all of the blame at your husband's feet if yours fails.
MeToo responded on August 15, 2008
The start of this article hit a nerve - in some ways it's the truth. Other readers are right, marriage is a two-way street and both parties must contribute to the health and well-being of the marriage. Which is what I think the author is trying to point out, in a not-so-humorous way (it hits too close to home for most of us). I've experienced lately the "roommate" scenario. After so many years of marriage, kids, careers, we have nothing left to relate to one another. Most days, it seems like we're just shadows passing in the same house. Except he still wants to have sex. I want the emotional side of the relationship resolved. Therein lies the struggle - he doesn't want to talk about it, I can't force him. So we go on living, quietly ignoring one another. As I see it, a marriage in the "danger zone" except the two parties are too stubborn to admit it. I wish the article followed through with some ideas on how to resolve the impasse. Otherwise, we've just started a conversation and haven't been given the tools to address the problem.
IMP responded on October 29, 2008
Was this funny? NOPE. It was familar though and from the previously posted comments hit a nerve with many. Unfortunately, I think American households especially do not offer spouses clear "zones" for separate living as well as times and zones for togetherness. There should be no "guilt" in solo activities when spouses AGREE to them. My husband taught our four daughters to come to their husbands during the evening hours, sit before them having brought dessert and coffee, lean forward and whisper your request plainly. You are a petitioner to the partner who you depend on aiding you to resolve issues ... you are never his antagonist. It is old-fashioned, it is old-world; but my sons-in-law respond surprisingly well for being Americans. They tell me they "feel respected and included in her world". My daughters tell me it is work to make a husband KNOW that he is their companion, hero and friend in a culture that is disrespectful, selfish and biased against men being MALE. ... So, in summary, I agree with the column -- but also with the men complaining about the column. Hmmm. It is thought provoking.
Tamose responded on November 16, 2008
Yeah, that's me. So my pampered princess left for greener grass. Frankly, I don't know if I could've kissed her butt and blown her nose enough to make her happy (every guy loves holding hands while watching dancing with the stars). Now it's golf/skiing or Las Vegas on the weekends. 'Drove the new Beemer 'last time (335i/twin turbos, never asks to talk about something stupid). No worries about staying out too late or calling if I do. No concerns about looking at, or speaking with, other women too long at parties (the oh s--t monent) regardless of being innocent. And none of the "What?" confusion that ensues when told about some ridiculous, illogical thing I supposedly did wrong. I'm an emotional wreck. How will I get by...